Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 750
Filter
1.
Rev. ORL (Salamanca) ; 15(1)25-03-2024. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-231855

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivo: La otosclerosis es una causa de hipoacusia en jóvenes, con mayor frecuencia en mujeres. La cirugía del estribo es un procedimiento correctivo ampliamente aceptado, con el advenimiento de la tecnología y cambios en la técnica, surge la interrogante de si existen diferencias entre ellas. Objetivo: Evaluar si existen diferencias en la ganancia auditiva entre técnicas y abordajes de las cirugías del estribo en pacientes con otosclerosis Método: Se recabaron variables demográficas, clínicas y quirúrgicas. Se aplicó estadística descriptiva. Se empleó prueba U de Mann-Whitney para variables numéricas, así como Kruskal Wallis para comparación diferencias en tres o más grupos. Se consideró significativo un valor de p ≤ a 0.05. Resultados: Entre los años 2020 y 2023 se realizaron 55 cirugías de estribo por otosclerosis, de las cuales 20 se tuvieron que excluir. De 35 cirugías en 31 pacientes, la media de edad de 41.16 ± 8.64 años, 77.4% fueron mujeres, el 51.4 % fueron en el oído derecho; se presentaron comorbilidades en el 25.7%, las complicaciones 5 presentaron hipoacusia, el 88.6 % de los procedimientos se encontró un cierre satisfactorio de la brecha aérea y ósea. No se presentaron diferencia entre las técnicas de la cirugía de estribo y resultados audiológicos postquirúrgicos p=0.872, ni con el tipo de abordaje de visualización p=0.636. Discusión: Nuestros resultados son similares a lo que encontraron algunos autores, no obstante, aún sigue existiendo incertidumbre sobre la mejor técnica. Conclusiones: No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuanto a la ganancia auditiva con el abordaje de visualización y el tipo de procedimiento en el estribo para la colocación de la prótesis. (AU)


Introduction and objective: Otosclerosis is a cause of hearing loss in young people, more frequently in women. Stapes surgery is a widely accepted corrective procedure, with the advent of technology and changes in technique, the question arises as to whether there are differences between them. Objective: To evaluate whether there are differences in hearing gain between techniques and approaches of stapes surgeries in patients with otosclerosis. Method: Demographic, clinical and surgical variables were collected. Descriptive statistics were applied. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for numerical variables, as well as the Kruskal Wallis test to compare differences in three or more groups. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Between 2020 and 2023, 55 stapes surgeries were performed for otosclerosis, of which 20 had to be excluded. Of 35 surgeries in 31 patients, mean age 41.16 ± 8.64 years, 77.4% were women, 51.4% were in the right ear; Comorbidities were present in 25.7%, 5 complications presented hearing loss, in 88.6% of the procedures a satisfactory closure of the air-bone gap was found. There was no difference between stapes surgery techniques and postsurgical audiological results p=0.872, nor with the type of visualization approach p=0.636. Discussion: Our results are similar to what some authors found, however, there is still uncertainty about the best technique. Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were found in terms of hearing gain with the visualization approach and the type of procedure in the stapes for placement of the prosthesis. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Stapes Surgery , Otosclerosis/complications , Hearing Loss , Stapes Surgery/methods , Stapes Surgery/trends , Microscopy
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(5): e16240, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hearing impairment is common following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). Previous studies have demonstrated that auditory processing disorder (APD) is the primary underlying pathology. Assistive listening devices (ALDs) can be used to manage APD but have not been explored in aSAH. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of an ALD for patients reporting hearing difficulty after aSAH. METHODS: This was a prospective pilot single-arm intervention study of an ALD for APD following aSAH. Patients who reported subjective hearing difficulty following aSAH were identified from the Wessex Neurological Centre aSAH database. Speech-in-noise was evaluated using the Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) test under 60 and 65 dB noise conditions. BKB performance was compared with and without an ALD. Cognition was assessed using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III. RESULTS: Fourteen aSAH patients with self-reported hearing loss were included in the analysis. Under both noise conditions the ALD significantly improved BKB performance (60 dB, Z = -3.30, p < 0.001; 65 dB, Z = -3.33, p < 0.001). There was no relationship between cognition and response to the ALD. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the marked benefit of ALDs to manage APD following aSAH, regardless of cognitive status. This finding has implications for the management of this common yet disabling deficit which impacts quality of life and employment. A further trial of ALDs in this patient group is needed to test whether these large, short-term benefits can be practically translated to the community for long-term benefit when used at home.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , Humans , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/complications , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/therapy , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Hearing , Hearing Loss/etiology
3.
Stroke ; 55(3): 705-714, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328930

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence from systematic reviews confirms that speech and language interventions for people with aphasia during the chronic phase after stroke (>6 months) improve word retrieval, functional communication, and communication-related quality of life. However, there is limited evidence of their cost-effectiveness. We aimed to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained from 2 speech and language therapies compared with usual care in people with aphasia during the chronic phase (median, 2.9 years) after stroke. METHODS: A 3-arm, randomized controlled trial compared constraint-induced aphasia therapy plus (CIAT-Plus) and multimodality aphasia therapy (M-MAT) with usual care in 216 people with chronic aphasia. Participants were administered a standardized questionnaire before intervention and at 12 weeks after the 2-week intervention/control period to ascertain health service utilization, employment changes, and informal caregiver burden. Unit prices from Australian sources were used to estimate costs in 2020. Quality-adjusted life years were estimated using responses to the EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level questionnaire. To test uncertainty around the differences in costs and outcomes between groups, bootstrapping was used with the cohorts resampled 1000 times. RESULTS: Overall 201/216 participants were included (mean age, 63 years, 29% moderate or severe aphasia, 61 usual care, 70 CIAT-Plus, 70 M-MAT). There were no statistically significant differences in mean total costs ($13 797 usual care, $17 478 CIAT-Plus, $11 113 M-MAT) and quality-adjusted life years (0.19 usual care, 0.20 CIAT-Plus, 0.20 M-MAT) between groups. In bootstrapped analysis of CIAT-Plus, 21.5% of iterations were likely to result in better outcomes and be cost saving (dominant) compared with usual care. In contrast, 72.4% of iterations were more favorable for M-MAT than usual care. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that both treatments, but especially M-MAT, may result in better outcomes at an acceptable additional cost, or potentially with cost savings. These findings are relevant in advocating for the use of these therapies for chronic aphasia after stroke.


Subject(s)
Aphasia , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Humans , Middle Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Australia , Aphasia/etiology , Aphasia/therapy , Stroke/complications , Stroke/therapy , Language Therapy
4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4451, 2024 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38396067

ABSTRACT

Despite the growing use of cochlear implants in deaf patients, there is a lack of data on their knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward cochlear implants. This study aimed to investigate the KAP toward cochlear implants among deaf patients who received cochlear implants. A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2022 and December 2022 among deaf patients who had received cochlear implants. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic characteristics and KAP scores. A total of 526 participants were enrolled; 54.18% were female, 65.40% were above 60 years old, and 61.03% were surveyed at less than 3 years after implantation. The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 8.15 ± 2.18 (possible range: 0-10), 43.63 ± 6.98 (possible range: 12-60), and 41.11 ± 7.42 (possible range: 11-55), respectively, indicating good knowledge, moderate attitude and practice. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that attitude [odd ratio (OR) = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-1.29, P < 0.001] and unemployment (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.63, P = 0.001) were independently associated with practice. Path analysis showed that knowledge directly influenced attitude (ß = 0.93, 95% CI 0.61-1.19, P < 0.001), attitude directly influenced practice (ß = 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.61, P < 0.001), and knowledge directly (ß = 0.77, 95% CI 0.53-1.01, P < 0.001) and indirectly (ß = 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.66, P < 0.001) influenced practice. Deaf patients who received cochlear implants showed good knowledge, moderate attitude and practice toward cochlear implants. Knowledge should be strengthened to improve attitude and practice toward cochlear implants, which could translate into realistic expectations toward cochlear implants devices and proper care and maintenance.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deafness/surgery
5.
Sci Total Environ ; 921: 171123, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387587

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the association of occupational noise with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components, and to assess the potential role of miRNAs in occupational noise-associated MetS. METHODS: A total of 854 participants were enrolled in our study. Cumulative noise exposure (CNE) was estimated in conjunction with workplace noise test records and research participants' employment histories. Logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders were used to assess the association of CNE and miRNAs with MetS and its components. RESULTS: We observed linear positive dose-response associations between occupational noise exposure and the prevalence of MetS (OR: 1.031; 95 % CI: 1.008, 1.055). And linear and nonlinear relationship were also found for the association of occupational noise exposure with high blood pressure (OR: 1.024; 95 % CI: 1.007, 1.041) and reduced high-density lipoprotein (OR: 1.051; 95 % CI: 1.031, 1.072), respectively. MiR-200a-3p, miR-92a-3p and miR-21-5p were inversely associated with CNE, or the prevalence of MetS and its components (all P < 0.05). However, we did not find any statistically significant mediation effect of miRNAs in the associations of CNE with MetS. Furthermore, the prevalence of bilateral hearing loss in high-frequency increased (OR: 1.036; 95 % CI: 1.008, 1.067) with CNE level rising, and participants with bilateral hearing loss in high-frequency had a significantly higher risk of MetS (OR: 1.727; 95 % CI: 1.048, 2.819). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that occupational noise exposure is associated with MetS and its components, and the role of miRNAs in noise-induced increasing MetS risk needs to be confirmed in future studies.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , Metabolic Syndrome , MicroRNAs , Noise, Occupational , Occupational Exposure , Adult , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Bilateral , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/epidemiology , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , China/epidemiology
6.
BMJ Open ; 14(1): e079850, 2024 01 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38199621

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Otitis media (middle ear disease) severity and chronicity among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, as well as gaps in socioeconomic outcomes related to hearing loss, indicates a breakdown in the current ear and hearing care system. The ear and hearing care system spans multiple sectors due to long-term impacts of otitis media and hearing loss in health, education and employment, necessitating a multi-disciplinary cross-sectorial approach to ear and hearing care. Public policies shape the current ear and hearing care system and here it is argued that a critical public policy analysis across different sectors is needed, with strong Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership and guidance. The current study aims to establish consensus-based ear and hearing care policy solutions for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multi-method study will be guided by a Brains Trust with strong Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership. Public policies in hearing health, social services, and education will be scoped to identify policy gaps, using the World Health Organization framework. Qualitative data will be collected through a culturally specific process of yarning circles to identify policy challenges and/or limitations in enabling accessible ear and hearing care programs/services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, using dimensions of Morestin's public policy appraisal tool as an interview guide for stakeholders. Themes from the yarning circles will be used to inform an expert Delphi process to establish consensus-based policy solutions for optimising the ear and hearing care system for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has approval from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Ethics Committee. Study findings will be disseminated to community through Brains Trust members and study participants, as well as through publications in peer-reviewed journals and research forum presentations.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Otitis Media , Humans , Australia , Hearing , Public Policy , Otitis Media/therapy
7.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(1): 245-251, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37435626

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term educational and occupational status of prelingually bilateral deaf children who received a cochlear implant (CI) before the age of 7, and to identify factors that influence these outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Single tertiary care center. METHODS: Seventy-one children who underwent CI surgery from 2000 to 2007 were included. The latest education and occupation status and word recognition score (WRS) were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery and the current age was 3.9 and 22.4 years. The age at CI showed a negative correlation with WRS. All subjects had graduated from high school or obtained an equivalent educational qualification. General high school graduates showed a higher WRS than those who attended a special education high school. The college entrance rate of CI patients (74.6% %) was comparable to that of the general population (72.5%). Subjects who went to college had a significantly better WRS than those who did not (51.4% vs 19.3%). Excluding 30 subjects currently enrolled in college, 26 (62%) of the remaining 41 were currently employed and engaged in various vocational activities, of which most (21 out of 26, 81%) were employed through vocational training institutes, or via special recruitment policy for the disabled. CONCLUSION: The long-term use of CI in prelingually deaf children enables not only speech perception but also produces comparable levels of education and employment to those of the general population. A good WRS and supportive policy were related to these successful outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Speech Perception , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Employment
8.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(1): 76-83, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37473437

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore how gender and low-income status independently influence general health care access in patients with hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: National database. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss from the National Institutes of Health All of Us database were included. Data entered from May 2018 to November 2022 was analyzed. Patient demographics such as age, gender, educational level, and insurance status were assessed. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: A subset of 8875 patients (48.3% male, mean age 69) were evaluated. After multivariate analysis, female participants were more likely than male participants to report difficulty affording prescribed medications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, p < .0005) and specialists (OR: 1.4, p < 0.005). Female patients were also more likely to delay care due to elder care responsibilities (OR: 2.6, p < .0005), employment obligations (OR: 1.7, p < .0005), and feelings of apprehension in seeing a provider (OR: 1.7, p < .0005). Finally, female participants reported feeling less likely to be involved in their own medical care compared to males (OR: 1.2, p < .005). Low-income (<$25,000) participants reported less likely to feel respected (OR: 3.2, p < .0005) and delivered understandable health information (OR: 2.3, p < .0005) by providers compared to participants of higher income. CONCLUSION: This work suggests that patients with hearing loss, female gender, and lower socioeconomic status independently introduce barriers to health care access and utilization. These factors should be considered in efforts to promote equity in the care of patients with hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Loss , Population Health , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss/therapy , Health Services Accessibility , Socioeconomic Factors
9.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(1): 104079, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37837844

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that forbids discrimination against individuals with certain disabilities, including hearing impairment. This study aimed to determine the nature of ADA discrimination complaints in individuals with cochlear implants. METHODS: A search for court decisions containing the terms "cochlear implant" and ("Americans with Disabilities Act" or "ADA") from 1985 to 2021 was performed with the Westlaw Campus Research legal database. Cases were included and analyzed if at least one of the plaintiffs had a cochlear implant and was claiming discrimination related to their hearing impairment based on the ADA. RESULTS: 24 cases initiated between 2003 and 2021 in 19 US states were identified based on inclusion criteria. The highest number of cases occurred in California (N = 4, 16.7 %). The alleged discrimination most frequently took place at a K-12 school (N = 9, 37.5 %), workplace (N = 7, 29.2 %), or during an encounter with police/correctional officers (N = 4, 16.7 %). Fourteen (58.3 %) cases involved complaints under Title II (Public Services) of the ADA. Seven (29.2 %) involved Title I (Employment) and 4 (16.7 %) involved Title III (Public Accommodations). Summary judgment was given in favor of the defendant or the case was dismissed entirely in 16 (66.7 %) of the cases. CONCLUSION: Patients with cochlear implants are still at risk of discrimination because of their disability. Cochlear implantees, school employees, workplace supervisors, and law enforcement personnel can benefit from ADA education.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Disabled Persons , Hearing Loss , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Employment , Hearing Loss/epidemiology
10.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142332

ABSTRACT

The hearing loss is one of the significant problems in the world. The disease can develop both for genetic reasons and under influence of external factors at work. The noise is the main indicator of occupational risk of hearing loss. Due to influence of noise and vibration, in certain crew members of water vessel develops professional sensorineural hearing loss that subsequently prevents signing of employment contract and continuation of work at sea. This circumstance confirms actuality of stated problematic. The article presents types of sensorineural hearing loss depending on classification criterion. The features of professional activities of seafarers in conditions of strong noise exposure are revealed. The methods of identifying hearing defects in ship crew members are determined. The advisable measures to protect hearing health and to prevent deafness are formulated.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Noise, Occupational , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Ships , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects
11.
Noise Health ; 25(118): 121-134, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815074

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Noise exposure in preschools is cited as one of the main stresses by preschool teachers in surveys worldwide. Hearing-related symptoms as well as physiological stress reactions are often mentioned in this context. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate whether the noise has an impact on the cardiovascular activity of the preschool teachers. Methods: The study took place in nine private preschools in Vienna. In the classrooms of 23 preschool teachers stationary noise recordings were conducted and the participants were equipped with 24-hour electrocardiograms (ECGs). Questionnaires on noise-related stress, well-being, stress perception, burnout risk, noise annoyance, and noise sensitivity were provided. Data were described descriptively and correlations and one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with repeated measures were performed. Results: The average sound pressure level in the classrooms during the first four hours was LAeq 74.7 dB(A) (standard deviation [SD] = 1.74). A significant correlation between heart rate and sound pressure level (LAeq,4 h) was found, r = 0.40, P = 0.04 (one-tailed). Noise sensitivity and noise annoyance showed no effect. With increasing sound level classes [≤65 dB(A), 66-75 dB(A), 76-85 dB(A)], the heart rate increased significantly, and the heart rate variability decreased significantly. It was also found that tolerating noise becomes more difficult with increasing length of employment and increasing age. Conclusion: The noise level in classrooms showed an impact on the cardiovascular activity of preschool teachers, which can be considered as an indicator of stress. Measures to reduce noise in preschools are recommended.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , School Teachers , Humans , Child, Preschool , Noise/adverse effects , Educational Status , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Med J Malaysia ; 78(5): 559-565, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37775479

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a common problem worldwide. Increased globalisation, as well as industrialisation, gives rise to an increase in the incidence of NIHL worldwide. Malaysia is not spared from this problem, either. The objectives were to determine the prevalence of NIHL and its associated factors among manufacturing factory workers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was done in Kuching, Sarawak, involving 173 randomly selected respondents among manufacturing factory workers. Data collected were respondents' workplace monitoring data and their audiometry records obtained from the factory record, and the otoscopy examinations performed. In addition, respondents were required to fill up an interviewer-guided questionnaire. RESULTS: The prevalence of NIHL was high (49.7%). The factors which were found to have a significant association with NIHL in bivariate analysis were age (p < 0.05, 95% CI), male gender (p < 0.05; OR - 7.60; CI 3.34 -18.38), duration of employment (p <0.05), knowledge of noise level (p < 0.05; OR - 4.11; CI 1.10 - 15.28), working at polishing department (p < 0.05; OR - 4.23; CI 2.13 - 8.43), and smoking (p < 0.05; OR - 39.6; CI 16.5 - 94.8). Pack-years of smoking were also found to have a significant association with p < 0.05. However, only smoking was statistically significant in multivariate analysis, where the risk of developing NIHL was 27.55 (p < 0.005; CI 10.74 - 70.64) among smokers. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of NIHL despite the existing Hearing Conservation Program (HCP) may indicate that there may be some elements in HCP that require close monitoring by the factory management, and the importance of smoking cessation among the workers exposed to noise at the workplace should be highlighted.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , Noise, Occupational , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Male , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Malaysia/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities
13.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol ; 25(3): 346-354, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37323004

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Over 140 000 Australians live with aphasia after stroke, with this number of people living with aphasia increasing significantly when aphasia arising from traumatic brain injury, neoplasm, and infectious and progressive neurological diseases is also included. The resulting communication disability frequently compromises every aspect of daily life, significantly impacting everyday activity, employment, social participation, mental health, identity, and family functioning. Rehabilitation services rarely meet the needs of this group who have, for example, poorer healthcare outcomes than stroke peers without aphasia, nor address long-term recovery and support needs.Method: In this discussion paper, I argue that given the broad impacts of aphasia, a biopsychosocial approach to aphasia rehabilitation is required. Rehabilitation must include: interventions to improve the communication environment; programs that directly target identity, wellbeing, and mental health; and therapies focusing on functional activity, communication participation, and long-term self-management.Result: The evidence for these approaches is mounting and includes strongly stated consumer needs. I discuss the need for multidisciplinary involvement and argue that for speech-language pathologists to achieve such comprehensive service provision, an expanded scope of practice is required.Conclusion: There is a need to rethink standard therapy approaches, timeframes, and funding mechanisms. It is time to reflect on our practice borders to ask what must change and define how change can be achieved.


Subject(s)
Aphasia , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Humans , Aphasia/rehabilitation , Australia , Delivery of Health Care , Mental Health , Stroke/psychology
14.
Ear Hear ; 44(6): 1322-1331, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37122080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to analyze the spatial and temporal association between socioeconomic gradient in hearing impairment among working-age Australians. DESIGN: We modeled the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between individual- and area-level socioeconomic status (SES) and hearing impairment among working-age Australians using longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey for 10,719 working-age adults aged between 15 and 64 years surveyed between 2008 and 2018. Associations between self-reported hearing impairment and education, income, employment status, and area-level SES were estimated using a multivariate logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for age, sex, and a range of other sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: Among 10,719 participants, the prevalence of hearing impairment was higher among individuals with lower income, occupational status and socioeconomic disadvantage. The odds ratio (OR) of those with the lowest income quintile versus highest income quintile (OR = 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.40 to 3.14); for blue-collar occupation versus white-collar (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.39 to 2.66) and most disadvantaged area quintile versus most advantaged area quintile (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.10 to 2.83) were associated with higher odds of prevalence of hearing impairment. For the 10,046 participants without hearing loss at baseline, income quintile 1 versus quintile 5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.33 to 1.56), ≤ year 11 versus ≥ bachelor's degree (HR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.98-2.34) blue-collar occupation versus white collar (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.25) and most disadvantaged area quintile versus most advantaged quintile (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.37 to 1.63) was positively associated with incident hearing impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Lower individual-level and area-level SES was associated with an increased risk of prevalence and incidence of hearing impairment among working-age Australians. These findings are particularly concerning since working-age Australians are mostly not eligible for socially subsidized hearing-related health care in Australia. This lack of access to affordable hearing services could exacerbate the negative consequences of hearing impairment and increase social inequality.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Social Class , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Australia/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Hearing Loss/epidemiology
15.
Orv Hetil ; 164(19): 747-752, 2023 May 14.
Article in Hungarian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37182199

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Numerous international studies have reported on the relevance of music therapy for aphasia, but music-based therapy for the rehabilitation of acquired language and speech disorders is not common in the clinical practice of Hungary. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to provide insights into the composition of professional teams involved in aphasia care in active neurology and stroke wards and rehabilitation departments in Hungarian hospitals, with a special focus on the presence of music therapists. We are looking for the answer to why the employment of music therapists in hospitals is so low in our country. METHOD: For our research, we selected the relevant institutions and departments from a list of hospitals on the website of the National Directorate General for Hospitals. Data were then collected from the websites of the hospital departments, supplemented or clarified with information from the head of department's physicians where necessary. RESULTS: None of the active neurology and stroke wards employ a music therapist. Two of the rehabilitation wards have a total of 4 music therapists. DISCUSSION: The low number of trained professionals in music therapy for aphasia is due to financial reasons, lack of professionals and lack of professional demand. CONCLUSION: Our research shows that music therapy is deeply underrepresented in the field of aphasia rehabilitation in Hungarian hospitals. The reasons for this are quite diverse and their elimination would require effective intervention in many areas. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(19): 747-752.


Subject(s)
Aphasia , Music Therapy , Music , Stroke , Humans , Hungary , Aphasia/rehabilitation , Stroke/complications , Stroke/therapy
16.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 66(4): 1410-1427, 2023 04 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36944181

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is unexplained variability in self-reported hearing aid outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate determinants of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings using a large-scale customer survey and to analyze the relation between demographic variables, hearing aid attributes, benefit, and satisfaction. METHOD: The study used a retrospective design wherein 2,109 hearing aid users, recruited by Hearing Tracker and Hearing Loss Association of America, completed an online survey. The survey included questions about demographics, perceived hearing loss, devices, service delivery, cost, benefit, and satisfaction. The analytic approach included descriptive summaries and regression models to evaluate potential determinants of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings. RESULTS: Hearing aid sound quality, fit and comfort, and battery life were related to both benefit and satisfaction. Respondents who rated these outcomes favorably were also likely to benefit from, and be satisfied with, their hearing aids. Benefit was also related to degree of hearing loss, hearing aid experience, and cost. Hearing aid users with greater self-perceived hearing loss, more hearing aid experience, and more expensive hearing aids reported more benefit. Satisfaction was also related to age, employment status, and brand. Younger respondents, those who were students, and those using certain brands reported more satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight importance of good hearing aid outcomes (quality, fit/comfort, and battery life) for benefit and satisfaction ratings. Professionals who fit hearing aids should strive to focus on achieving these outcomes and researchers should strive to explain the remaining variability in ratings of benefit and satisfaction. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22280854.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Self Report , Patient Satisfaction
17.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0283171, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36928424

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Often considered an "invisible disability", hearing loss is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases and the third leading cause for years lived with disability worldwide. Hearing loss has substantial impacts on communication, psychological wellbeing, social connectedness, cognition, quality of life, and economic independence. The Hearing impairment in Adults: a Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS) aims to evaluate the: (1) impacts of hearing devices (hearing aids and/or cochlear implants), (2) differences in timing of these interventions and in long-term outcomes between hearing aid and cochlear implant users, and (3) cost-effectiveness of early intervention for adult-onset hearing loss among hearing device users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HALOS is a mixed-methods study collecting cross-sectional and longitudinal data on health and social outcomes from 908 hearing aid and/or cochlear implant users aged ≥40 years, recruited from hearing service providers across Australia. The quantitative component will involve an online survey at baseline (time of recruitment), 24-months, and 48-months and will collect audiological, health, psychosocial, functional and employment outcomes using validated instruments. The qualitative component will be conducted in a subset of participants at baseline and involve semi-structured interviews to understand the patient journey and perspectives on the Australian hearing service model. ETHICS: This study has been approved by the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 11262) and Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (ID: LNR/22/SAC/88). Dissemination of results: Study findings will be disseminated to participants via a one-page summary, and to the public through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) registration number: ACTRN12622000752763.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Adult , Humans , Australia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss/psychology , Quality of Life
18.
BMJ Open ; 13(3): e064514, 2023 03 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36889821

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Severe hearing loss is a sensory deficit with considerable impact on the patient's daily life and on society. Previous research has established occupational obstacles in professionally active patients with hearing loss. However, studies investigating the impact of severe hearing loss and cochlear implantation (CI) on work performance using a quantitative and longitudinal study design and validated questionnaires are lacking. This study aims to answer the following research question: 'What is the impact of unilateral and bilateral severe hearing loss and CI on the cost for society, health state, employment, productivity and social well-being?'. We hypothesise hearing impairment to influence work performance. After establishing the impact, we will be able to enhance the support of hearing impaired patients to maintain employed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 200 professionally active adults between 18 and 65 years old with severe hearing loss will be included for assessment at baseline and reassessment at 3, 6 and 12 months. The following four study groups are included: bilateral severely hearing impaired participants without CI (1) and with CI (2) and unilateral severely hearing impaired participants in acute (3) and chronic (4) setting. The primary outcome of this study is the change in index score on the Work Limitations Questionnaire, which evaluates the degree of limitations and health-related productivity loss. Secondary outcome measures include audiometric and cognitive evaluations and validated questionnaires evaluating employment, work productivity, quality of life and direct healthcare costs. Linear mixed models will assess the evolution in time and the difference in evolution between groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol (project ID 2021-0306) received ethical approval from the ethics committee of the Antwerp University Hospital on 22 November 2021. Our findings will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05196022.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Hearing , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Loss/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Augment Altern Commun ; 39(3): 181-197, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36974690

ABSTRACT

Workplace accommodations can reduce barriers to employment for people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), however, the lack of accommodations continues to challenge participation in employment. This systematic review identified and analyzed barriers and facilitators to implementing workplace accommodations for adults (19 years and over) who use AAC. A systematic search of nine databases was conducted to identify relevant studies using the search terms "AAC" and "workplace accommodations" and variations of each term. Results were imported into Covidence. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Results were presented using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. The Oxford levels of evidence and Confidence in Evidence from Review of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) were used to assess the quality of the studies and confidence in findings, respectively. Environmental barriers related mainly to attitudes and technology, and personal barriers related to job qualifications, education, and work-related skills. A combination of facilitators such as personal strengths, access to technology, and supportive relationships contributed to successful implementation of accommodations. The findings of this review suggest that implementing workplace accommodations for adults who use AAC strategies is complex and further research is needed to advance practices and policies that support the implementation of workplace accommodations.


Subject(s)
Communication Aids for Disabled , Communication Disorders , Humans , Adult , Workplace , Employment , Communication
20.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36725295

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore the change of hearing threshold of workers exposed to noise, establish an individual-based hearing loss early warning model, accurately and differentiated the health of workers exposed to noise. Methods: In September 2019, all physical examination data of 561 workers exposed to noise from an enterprise were collected since their employment. Three indicators of average hearing threshold of the better ear, namely, at high frequency, 4000 Hz and speech frequency, were constructed. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to adjust gender and age and establish the warning model of each indicator. Finally, sensitive indicators and warning models were screened according to AUC and Yoden index. Results: Among the 561 workers exposed to noise, 26 (4.6%) workers had hearing loss. The sensitivity indicators were the average hearing threshold at speech frequency ≥20 dB, high frequency ≥30 dB and 4000 Hz ≥25 dB. The AUC of each index was 0.602, 0.794 and 0.804, and the Youden indexes were 0.204, 0.588 and 0.608, respectively. In GEE of hearing loss warning models, high-frequency hearing threshold ≥20 dB and 4000 Hz hearing threshold ≥25 dB were the optimal models, with AUC of 0.862. Conclusion: Combined with the changes of individual hearing threshold over the years, can accurately assess the risk of individual hearing loss of workers exposed to noise.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , Noise, Occupational , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Audiometry , Employment , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...